Comments on: Episode 114 – Research and Destroy http://deadrobotssociety.com/2010/01/19/episode-114-research-and-destroy/ Writers on Writing Wed, 01 Feb 2012 20:26:15 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1 By: Wesley Swingley http://deadrobotssociety.com/2010/01/19/episode-114-research-and-destroy/comment-page-1/#comment-1934 Wesley Swingley Fri, 22 Jan 2010 19:53:04 +0000 http://deadrobotssociety.com/?p=1316#comment-1934 Don't tell Neal Stephenson! But I still love ya Neal, even with your infodumps. In all honesty, I think "infodumping" has gotten a bad rap. I read plenty of material that contains secondary data that doesn't get in the way of the story, and I'd argue Star Trek is one of those (at least imho). Do we, as authors, unnecessarily avoid exposition because we've been taught to fear the infodump? I, personally, felt Perdido Street Station suffered from far too much infodump, so that brings up another point: is one man's infodump another man's treasured writing? Does Neal Stephenson remain successfull because he gives his readers just the infodump they are looking for? Don’t tell Neal Stephenson!

But I still love ya Neal, even with your infodumps. In all honesty, I think “infodumping” has gotten a bad rap. I read plenty of material that contains secondary data that doesn’t get in the way of the story, and I’d argue Star Trek is one of those (at least imho). Do we, as authors, unnecessarily avoid exposition because we’ve been taught to fear the infodump? I, personally, felt Perdido Street Station suffered from far too much infodump, so that brings up another point: is one man’s infodump another man’s treasured writing? Does Neal Stephenson remain successfull because he gives his readers just the infodump they are looking for?

]]> By: Bryan http://deadrobotssociety.com/2010/01/19/episode-114-research-and-destroy/comment-page-1/#comment-1927 Bryan Thu, 21 Jan 2010 18:04:50 +0000 http://deadrobotssociety.com/?p=1316#comment-1927 Yep. Falls squarely under show-don't-tell. I think a very good example of a science fiction story that felt really consistent and never threw up any alarm bells for me (a scientist) despite a LOT of creative science is Perdido Street Station (and The Scar, set in the same world) by China Mieville. Yep. Falls squarely under show-don’t-tell. I think a very good example of a science fiction story that felt really consistent and never threw up any alarm bells for me (a scientist) despite a LOT of creative science is Perdido Street Station (and The Scar, set in the same world) by China Mieville.

]]> By: JustinMacumber http://deadrobotssociety.com/2010/01/19/episode-114-research-and-destroy/comment-page-1/#comment-1926 JustinMacumber Thu, 21 Jan 2010 17:57:41 +0000 http://deadrobotssociety.com/?p=1316#comment-1926 Exactly, Bryan. The best way to get a reader confident in your science/tech/what-have-you is for your characters to be confident with it. Whenever I've consuming a story and the characters deal with their universe assuredly and without fumbling for explanations I feel like I can just flow with it. It's when they try to oversell it that I have to back away. It's one of the problems with a lot of television Star Trek - the techno-jargon gets too thick. It's as though the story ceases to be about the characters and instead becomes about the science. That's no fun. Exactly, Bryan. The best way to get a reader confident in your science/tech/what-have-you is for your characters to be confident with it. Whenever I’ve consuming a story and the characters deal with their universe assuredly and without fumbling for explanations I feel like I can just flow with it. It’s when they try to oversell it that I have to back away. It’s one of the problems with a lot of television Star Trek – the techno-jargon gets too thick. It’s as though the story ceases to be about the characters and instead becomes about the science. That’s no fun.

]]> By: Bryan http://deadrobotssociety.com/2010/01/19/episode-114-research-and-destroy/comment-page-1/#comment-1925 Bryan Thu, 21 Jan 2010 17:39:12 +0000 http://deadrobotssociety.com/?p=1316#comment-1925 Fun episode. I think you should always undersatand the science of a sci fi story 1 level above that which appears in the story. If you try to work at your level, you'll always end up finding problems later on. In other words, use science to construct your story, but don't ever info dump it. Let the reader put it together from dialogue and small hints. If they get it great! If they don't ever put together how your warp drive works, they'll at least feel like the characters are familiar with it and find in hindsight that the tech had no jarring inconsistencies. Fun episode. I think you should always undersatand the science of a sci fi story 1 level above that which appears in the story. If you try to work at your level, you’ll always end up finding problems later on. In other words, use science to construct your story, but don’t ever info dump it. Let the reader put it together from dialogue and small hints. If they get it great! If they don’t ever put together how your warp drive works, they’ll at least feel like the characters are familiar with it and find in hindsight that the tech had no jarring inconsistencies.

]]>